ASP (classic) SAML 1.1 Consumer application (port from an EXISTING C# example - collaberation encouraged)(repost)

Summary: We need a SAML 1.1 “Consumer?? application ported from C#/ASPX to? ASP (Classic) in VBScript. This application will process a standard SAML 1.1 Assertion element. We ahve an existing C# implementation that the dev would use as the example to create an ASP classic version. (Note: this request is for only a subset/portion of the SAML 1.1 standard. See the included C# sample for details.) NOTE #1:? we are open to a creative solution when it comes to the encryption library needed for this.? The classic ASP world doesn't offer built in libraries for this. NOTE #2:? We can have one of our developers who built the C# version of this work directly with the winner of this bid.? What we lack is a STRONG resource in ASP Classic.? We can work directly with that person on the SAML and encryption details. ## Deliverables The application must: ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Be written in ASP (Classic) compatible VBScript ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Duplicate the functionality of the included C# code sample ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Make use of only well-known protocols and document formats (e.g., XML, UTF-8, HTTP and URL encoding, etc…) ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Be ***stateless*** ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Run under IIS as a virtual directory / virtual application: o? ? IIS 5 o? ? IIS 6 o? ? IIS 7 ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Run on Windows: o? ? Windows 98 (latest service pack) o? ? Windows Server 2003 (latest service pack) ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Be completely self-contained, i.e., it must: o? ? Function entirely as a server-side application o? ? Not rely on, or make use of any browser-based technologies other than standard HTTP protocol o? ? Be capable of running independently of other co-located web applications o? ? References to external libraries may appropriate, as long as each library is either §? Present on all Windows OS machines, OR §? Can be acquired and installed on any Windows OS machine ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Receive a standard, well-formed, cryptographically signed SAML 1.1 Assertion envelope as an HTTP POST ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Verify that the Assertion envelope is well-formed and complete (as per the SAML 1.1 spec, hyperlinked below) ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Validate the following Conditions element attributes to ensure the Assertion falls within the specified time range o? ? NotBefore o? ? NotOnOrAfter ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Verify that the Responder correctly cryptographically signed the assertion payload (“saml:Assertion?? node). In doing this, the component must: o? ? Use a crypto library that is compatible with the .Net Framework’s X509Certificates library ([login to view URL]) o? ? Provide a way to load the appropriate public key (as an XML text file, or some other universal format) for validation o? ? (Validating the root chain of signing certificate is ***not*** required) ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Extract, and display in the browser window, the following ***required*** Assertion details: o? ? The NameID or NameIdentifier value ??" as a string o? ? The following Conditions attributes §? NotBefore ??" as a DateTime or equivalent value §? NotOnOrAfter ??" as a DateTime or equivalent value o? ? Whether or not the Assertion envelope is correctly signed (as a Boolean value) o? ? One of the following: §? The text of the entire Assertion envelope, OR §? A message explaining the likely reason that the Assertion text could not be displayed o? ? (Other functionality as appropriate ??" optional) ? It is the developer’s responsibility to: ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Research and recommend any external or 3rd-party libraries (e.g., ASP X509 cryptographic libraries), and either o? ? Provide those libraries, and a redistributable license to us, OR o? ? Include enough information for us to acquire a redistributable license for the libraries ourselves ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Ensure compatibility with the SAML 1.1 standard ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Ensure compatibility with the X509 cryptographic standard ·? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Provide a ***working prototype or example*** of the solution,? complete with: o? ? All source code and miscellaneous development files o? ? Functional documentation o? ? Implementation / API documentation (i.e., “developer’s docs??) o? ? Setup and troubleshooting documentation (i.e., “Ops docs??) ? Note that an example of our current SAML Assertion envelope will be provided to the winner of this bid once we have established a standard Non-disclosure in place. The core SAML 1.1 standard:? <[login to view URL]> ? An overview of the SAML 1.1 standard: <[login to view URL]> ?